Posts Tagged ‘Business’

A Union with Business - Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

It’s a struggle for CEOs in the current business climate. Profit seems to be an ever more elusive goal and the federal government isn’t helping.

Julia wants workers paid more, Wayne doesn’t want them redundant, Kevin has run out of stimulus, customers wont pay a cent more than half-price and Penny is poised to plant a huge carbon footprint all over the bottom line.

The Federal Labor Government has many fine qualities but it wouldn’t get a pass in business studies. One of its outstanding assets is a remarkable pool of talent for running unions; in fact it is arguably more qualified to run a union than run the country.

Parliamentary insiders were hardly surprised therefore to hear mutterings in the members bar that the post neo-liberal way ahead for business should be the adoption of management techniques pioneered by the unions.

There is no question that in recent years the unions have been absolutely brilliant at explaining how successful they were at the same time as their membership was declining rapidly. They were also highly successful at explaining why organisations employing their members were an absolute disgrace despite the fact they were making record profits..

There are inestimable benefits for CEOs through managing things the union way. They could bring a whole new era to industrial relations by agreeing to union pay claims before they are made. And just think how thrilled shareholders would be when told their annual dividend was a donation to the Labor Party made on their behalf.

By converting employees to card-carrying members CEOs could effect huge savings in payroll tax payments and recruiting the right people would become so much easier with a three strikes and you’re in policy.

Of course no one is advocating that business should follow the union model to the letter. It would be utterly inappropriate to introduce ‘go-slow’s and ‘stop work meetings’ into management work practices where they’ve traditionally been called golf-days and lunch .

Once they had adopted the union model CEOs would find the incessant day to day pressures of driving sales and profits would evaporate. They would quickly learn how to live happily with debt and deficit and like Wayne become entirely relaxed about not being debt-free until 2022. Those who have lately come to regard their organisations as much like their wives would soon come to see them again as much more like their mistresses.

CEOs who embrace this revolutionary concept would be able to apply management techniques successfully proven through union best practice. Problems with difficult customers and suppliers could be expeditiously addressed through demonstrations and picketing outside their premises with verbal abuse and rioting ready to be deployed in cases of unacceptable provocation.

Arguably the most tantalising prospect for a CEO would be the opening up of the union succession programme to the federal ministry and even the PM’s office. All it takes is a bit of branch stacking and suddenly an ex-CEO has the power to change the course of a nation from work choices to fair work to fair redundancy.

With Kevin, Julia, Wayne, Penny and Sharan Burrow on their team the potential for CEOs would be mind-blowing. The only other thing they could possibly need is someone to advise on how to cope when the economy turns round and they are in danger of making a profit.

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe

A Surplus of Deficits - Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

A Surplus of Deficits Or a Deficit of Surpluses

Never has the difference in budget strategy between the main political parties been so clearly defined. Labor does deficits, the Coalition does surpluses.

It is true that first time round Wayne produced a budget surplus. This was an unfortunate temporary glitch because it took him till his second budget to clear up the huge surplus mess left by John and Peter.

Labor’s policy is to avoid budget surpluses at all costs as they upset the unions too much. The unions hate them even more than company profits because they are usually wasted on paying off deficits.

Labor’s budget deficits however have made an outstanding contribution to Australian living standards. The party realises that infrastructure development and welfare reform are only affordable when you throw off the shackles of making a surplus and dive unrestrainedly into deficit.

The Coalition’s rigid focus on delivering surpluses means they can never afford to invest in roads, hospitals, pension increases, paid parental leave and sufficient overseas aid to guarantee Kevin a retirement gig at the United Nations.

Gough, Joan Kirner and Paul Keating all spent their way merrily into deficit secure in the knowledge that when they got kicked out for profligacy the Coalition would produce surpluses to pick up the tab.

Wayne’s legacy will be a different matter. Surpluses may not be enough to pay it off. The Coalition may have to take desperate measures to make up the shortfall by selling their bodies. Medibank Private and Telstra are arguably the most attractive they could offer.

If Kevin and Wayne are serious about getting out of debt and deficit they will adopt the Kennett doctrine. But don’t hold your breath. The unions believe the doctrine is the Taliban edition of work choices.

It was immensely reassuring to hear Wayne talk about the deficit as temporary, similar to the Sydney Harbour Bridge toll.

Japan has gone so deep into deficit they’re pioneered a breakthrough budget concept called deficit surplus. Now there’s an idea for Wayne. He might not be so coy about discussing the size of the budget deficit if he could present it as a surplus.

True to form the Coalition government in Western Australia has just declared a budget surplus. Kevin must be really pissed. It spoils his grand vision of leading an Australia totally united in a crusade of deficit nation building. He’ll probably try to fix things by sending WA the bill for Peter Garrett’s overseas junkets.

Life offers some pretty daunting possibilities at the moment. Wayne is threatening to drown us in debt, Malcolm is threatening to hang us out to dry on a lifeline of economic rationalism and Bob Brown is threatening us with tornadoes, soaring temperatures, plague and pestilence. Presumably that’s like living in Melbourne.

And another thing. If life wasn’t meant to be one long surplus how come there’s never a deficit of politicians?

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe