Articles from Weekly Mash

Coalition Attrition - Thursday, September 2nd, 2010


Only now is Australia coming to grips with the mind-numbing reality that it has voted for a coalition. As a special service to the community in its hour of need Friday Mash has undertaken a worldwide survey into coalitions and their consequences.

Earlier this year the Devious Dropkick, Labor premier of Tasmania, launched a pre-election diatribe at the Greens Party labelling them as ‘evil’. His clear inference was that a coalition with them would be akin to putting his head into the mouth of a lion who is suffering from chronic hay fever.

On a recent Lateline the Devious Dropkick described his party’s coalition with the Greens as a haven of harmony based on profound mutual trust and respect. It was hard to believe he had originally tried to deny Tasmanians this utopia of unanimity by going into the election with the aim of the Labor Party governing in its own right.

It all sounded too lovely for words until the interviewer revealed that the coalition government’s greatest achievement to date was establishing a study group into gay marriage. This congenital coalition inaction however has an upside. The coalition partners prevent each other from implementing braindead party policies.

The coalition government in the UK between the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats has not become the train-wreck so confidently forecast by the Labor Party. This is because David Cameron has turned out to be slightly to the left of Nick Clegg and the Labor Party are so confused they don’t know whether they’re pinkies, greenies or Brownies.

The coalition government has surprised everyone taking drastic action to keep the UK out of bankruptcy. This has really pissed the left wing of the Labor Party who have been pursuing bankrupt policies for years. It’s also pissed sections of the Liberal Democrats but what’s a bit of serious cost cutting if by some unintended electoral malfunction you’ve unexpectedly made it into government.

Italy has always been governed by coalitions because they have a much better understanding of congenital chaos. Italian voters are so coalition minded they don’t appreciate there could be more efficient ways of governing the joint. But that’s the political legacy of a country where presidents are kept in power by the unanimous vote of their mistresses.

In Australia we’ve had a coalition for years and it’s a dire waring to all those who think this form of government offers hope for the future

The punters who believe independents are the answer to the country’s parliamentary malaise are obviously suffering post election brain damage. Rob Oakeshott seems a particular challenge. He suggested that Malcolm should join Julia’s cabinet or Kevin should join Tony’s cabinet. That sounded like a commendably even-handed approach to creating rampant chaos no matter which party forms government.

Tony Windsor claims to dislike the Nationals, the Labor Party, the Greens and Tony. This seems like a promising basis for forming an unstable coalition government.

Bob Katter’s a chatter whose natter can batter, shatter or splatter not flatter his hatter at Parramatta Regatta. In fact the latter could scatter in tatters with his head on a platter.

The conclusion is that most coalitions operate like the United Nations, a homogeneous body of do-nothingness. Come to think of it Julia might describe them as parliamentary citizens assemblies.

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe

Population Strangulation - Thursday, August 19th, 2010


Australia has traditionally pursued population and immigration policies that have made it number one on the immigrant and asylum seeker destination world rankings.

Things started to go off the rails a bit through the application of multiculturalism and political correctness and the concept that asylum seekers are not immigrants. To really put a spoke in the works however it took the intervention of braindead governments, especially the Labor model in NSW.

It’s all very well to bring in immigrants who increase production and consumption and so produce increased government revenues. Unfortunately the NSW Government failed to comprehend that if they didn’t direct some of those revenues towards new roads, public transport, hospitals and power generation to accommodate the extra population they would stuff the joint.

As a consequence there is a strong likelihood that before too long World Vision will be appealing to the people of Bangladesh to support a family in Sydney.

Sydneysiders seem destined to spend much of their lives in traffic gridlock or stuck on trains which never arrive anywhere. Commodores which are jammed for years on the F3 will increasingly become the locations for births and marriages although the huge increase in stationary traffic should cut the road toll.

NRMA roadside assistance services will have to cover things like catering, midwifery, church services and helicopter services for car owners to visit their other homes if they can still afford them. Car purchases could be arranged by helicoptering in a new car to replace the old one which is helicoptered out. A twin turbo delivery on the F3 could be a car or twins.

Other commuters could live permanently in their offices or on trains. Time and motion experts are already devising a plan to help them complete their morning ablutions by cycling them through one minute toilet stops at succeeding stations.

The lesson from NSW is that an insustainable government can’t create a sustainable population.

Population Density in Sydney

From 2006 census

Kevin was keen on building a huge Australia because he saw it as a way of ruling the world without having to leave the country.

The Greens have an interesting population policy. They seem to be proposing control of population and emissions by only accepting immigrants with no carbon footprints and championing gay marriage especially amongst heterosexuals.

They strongly support people smuggler operations and are rumoured to favour outsourcing the country’s immigration programme to them.

Tony has been warning that the current federal government has been allowing an annual immigrant intake large enough to populate another Canberra. That’s encouraging. It would almost certainly be an improvement on the existing one.

Perhaps the NSW Government policy of strangulating Sydney is aimed to encourage immigrants to settle elsewhere. However Afghans have a distinct preference for Sydney over building a new Kabul in the Simpson Desert and Tamil Tigers show no interest in roaming the jungles of North Queensland.


Unless the NSW Government can summon a Mary MacKillop miracle Sydney will continue to slide towards second or even third world status. Australia will tumble headlong down the immigrant and asylum seeker destination world rankings to a place of shame even below Aceh and NZ.

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe

Return of the Prodigal - Thursday, August 12th, 2010

Kevin was the most profligate of political prodigals. His reckless spending spread like wildfire through Green Loans, pink batts, white elephants, COLAs, a national broadband network and stimulus packages of every possible sort and rort.

And as if that wasn’t enough there was another pressing reason for the Labor Party to cap and trade him. He was a prissy pompous pain-in-the-arse control freak whose poll numbers were falling faster than a worm when Tony’s talking.

The voice of the Labor Party’s faceless men began to be heard, although no-one could tell where it was coming from. They insisted that Kevin be dumped and prevailed upon sister Julia to do the dirty, without so much as a sailor’s farewell or a foreign ministry.

There was much rejoicing throughout the land and the sisterhood claimed PM Julia as their own.

All too soon however PM Julia started behaving like a graduate from the Joan Kirner School of Political Pantomime. She rang the wrong number in East Timor, resolved the resources tax issue with the miner part of the industry not the major and decided that a Citizens Assembly would make more sense on climate change than Penny Wong and Peter Garrett; at least she got that right.

Her crucial mistake was failing to foresee that although they rated Kevin the most pusillanimous of prodigals voters would be really pissed off with her for rissoling him because they were savouring the prospect of doing it themselves.

Kevin slipped away to the US because in comparison with the ultra profligate Obama he’s merely regarded there like someone who got carried away at a David Jones Sale.

He got offered a gig at the world palace of prodigality, the United Nations, but he was not to be swayed form his ultimate dream of perfecting prodigality in Australia.

Upon Kevin’s return the surgeons did their best to ensure he wouldn’t have the gall to do any damage to Julia’s election campaign. Despite frantic efforts by the Labor Party they still haven’t been able to get hold of Mark Latham to do the same to him.

Meanwhile Julia made a shocking discovery. Halfway through the election campaign she found she wasn’t herself. Then she had an even more shocking epiphany. The voters in Queensland preferred going in the wrong direction with Kevin than the right direction with her even if she became somebody else.

She perceived that the only way she could hang on to the PM’s gig was by bringing the prodigal Kevin back into the fold and persuading him to support her by agreeing he could make even more prodigal promises in this campaign than in 07..

And so the prodigal returned to rejoicing in the Coalition while the faceless men in the Labor Party lost even more face.

Julia is confronting the dilemma that her saviour hates her guts. And the prodigal Kevin has still to make it clear whether he’s returned to secure his own seat rather than save her arse.

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe

Frightening Experiences - Thursday, August 5th, 2010

It is fascinating to analyse the careers of politicians before entering parliament and speculate on the likely sources of future generations of political talent.

The union movement seems to be an inevitable source but following the failure of Simon Crean and Martin Ferguson to make any sort of sense, the possibility that Bill Shorten has assassinated Labor’s chances of winning this election and awful prospect of the bumptious Paul Howes hovering in the wings, we can only hope that future union prospects will be subject to parliamentary work bans.

You could be forgiven for believing that the odd accountant in parliament wouldn’t go amiss; that is until Barnaby Joyce came along.

Instead of ex-cop Peter Dutton bringing stronger law enforcement protocols to parliament it looks like his parliamentary career could get arrested at next election.

Journalists make a significant contribution to the political process but Bob Carr, Maxine McKew and Tony Abbott have demonstrated that this attribute ceases after they become politicians.

Public disquiet at the prospect of Kerry O’Brien and Tony Jones becoming members of the parliamentary Labor Party is allayed by the thought of them being interviewed by Alan Jones.

Anthony Albanese worked in the banking industry but was powerless to prevent Kevin’s bank of public goodwill going so quickly into the red.

Warren Truss used to be a farmer and seems to have confused going into politics with being put out to grass.

It is blindingly obvious that federal parliament is suffering from a surfeit of lawyers. Julia, Penny Wong, Nicola Roxon, Julie and Bronwyn Bishop have all become a law unto themselves. Christopher Pyne embodies the view that ‘the law is an ass’ and Joe Hockey got into politics because he couldn’t get into his briefs.

Heaven help us from further incursions into politics by the green movement. Peter Garrett can hardly qualify any more as one of the Labor Party’s green preferences and at all cost we must be protected from the Green senators from Tasmania changing our concept of a family tree from a heritage to a home.

Malcolm entered parliament as the great white hope from business but alas he’s turned out to be carbon tax deductible.

Before Kevin and Wayne entered parliament they were political staffers who had already qualified as political animals. Some experts believe however that it would be in the national interest if in future all political animals aspiring to become parliamentarians had their pedigree thoroughly checked by the RSPCA.

It’s no wonder that politicians are so keen on keeping out asylum seekers. They’re frightened of the competition.

There have been moves in some quarters to encourage strippers to enter parliament as a way of promoting full disclosure and also hookers to demonstrate the merit of prompt attention to pressing public needs.

Some commentators believe we should look on high to source future political leadership. But even if the Archangel became prime minister it is unlikely Julia would believe in him.

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe

Slogans for Bogans - Thursday, July 29th, 2010

There’s sharp disagreement amongst advertising gurus about the rationale for slogans in political election campaigns.

Some believe they have to be included because they’re the creations of party leaders and no-one is prepared to tell them how mind-numbing they are. Others believe they are a handy way of differentiating one campaign from another.

Over the past five federal elections the Australian Labor Party slogans have been ignored by millions. ‘A safe and secure future for all’ was followed three years later by ‘A secure future for all’. Obviously they couldn’t afford a new campaign but recognised the futility of claiming a Labor Government is safe.

Then came ‘Mark Latham and Labor taking the pressure off working families’. The pressure certainly came off once they’d lost the election.

‘Kevin 07. New Leadership’ was an absolute triumph only diluted to some degree by the fact that Kevin’s new leadership didn’t prosper beyond 07. By 2010 even his own party considered it long past its use-by date.

Labor’s predeliction for ‘Moving Forward’ in 2010 is entirely understandable given that there’s Kevin and Mark Latham in their recent past.

The Coalition’s slogan in 07 was ‘Go for Growth’ and in 2010 it is ‘Stand up for real action’. These are apparently quotes lifted from Tony Abbott’s exercise regime.

The Weekly Mash pick for the most mind-changing campaign slogan of all time is the NSW Labor Government’s 2007 epic ‘More to do but we’re moving in the right direction’. Our sources reveal that they will probably go in 2011 with ‘Getting round to doing something by going in ever decreasing circles’.

They were only saved in 07 by Peter Debnam saying ‘Let’s fix NSW’ which was rightly perceived as more of a threat than a promise.

The current federal election campaigns are reducing Weekly Mash to despair. Some sense and colour urgently need to be injected to prevent an irreversible torpor setting in amongst the electorate. Here are our slogans especially crafted to prevent the next three weeks becoming a bigger blancmange than Kevin’s 2020 Summit.

‘Let’s work with the people smugglers to build a sustainable population’
‘Climate change, let’s sweat it out together’
‘Tony Abbott – God’s gift to women recommended by the Pope’
‘Let’s work together to stuff the unions’
‘Let’s build a future for ourselves and forget our bloody children’
‘If Labor wins they’re going to make Kevin PM again’
‘The Mining Tax. It’s the real pits’
‘Ordinary policies for ordinary Australians’
‘Julia Gillard is Mark Latham in drag’
‘Let’s make working families work harder’
‘Build the Education Revolution. Help kids take over the schools’
‘Stop pensioners becoming a burden on our economy. Make the buggers work’
‘We guarantee no promises will be broken because we’re not making any’
‘Asylum seekers can make a huge contribution to Australian culture by going somewhere else’
‘Let’s bring Australia together in one huge orgy’
‘Let’s get into surplus in 2013 and spend it all on grog’

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe

Nice Work If You Can Get It - Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

There’s always been the feeling that a presidency or a prime ministership is a pretty tough gig; lots of stuff hitting the fan all the time and people like Mark Arbib and Bill Shorten always lurking around behind you.

Yet those who aspire to the highest office are prepared even to kiss babies, promise free beer and prostitute their most dearly-held principles in order to get gonged. Such single-minded dedication appears to indicate that top jobs are more of a doddle than we thought. If it was only the power they’re after it would be much easier to get it in spades as head of a drug cartel.

A close inspection of president and prime minister job descriptions reveals they are carefully framed to prevent incumbents from stuffing their countries. This is because the system sometimes allows ratbags to get elected who wouldn’t know a BER from a huge waste of money.

These ratbags invariably believe they know what they’re doing and so have the potential to cause untold damage to the nation. The trick is to make them believe they’re having they’re having a governmental effect while the bureaucrats carry on with business as usual.

Leaders like Kevin and Obama are a constant source of irritation because they don’t understand they’re not supposed to do much and insist on trying to do things in areas where their level of expertise is on a par with BP’s ability to plug oil spills.

One of the main fringe benefits accruing from national leadership status is an aura of power which women like Monica Lewinsky, Marilyn Monroe and Blanche d’Alpuget find quite irresistible.

What’s more the job seems to allow ample time for this benefit to be fully exploited. Indeed it appears likely that Bill Clinton, John Kennedy and Bob Hawke scarcely had time for anything else.

The top positions also seem to provide a huge amount of time for incumbents to indulge in a wide range of outrageous goings-on which help make them fortunes later on from selling their memoirs.

It’s a big advantage memoirs-wise if they have someone in their cabinet like Paul Keating or Gordon Brown who are continually slagging them off and trying to nick their job. It’s even better if they’re in a position like Kevin where the whole cabinet was slagging him off and then comprehensively threw him out.

Great leaders are identified by great quotes like ‘Ask not what your country can do for you’ and ‘Tear down this wall’ which are designed to get other people to do things as opposed to commiting themselves to doing anything. ‘Kevin 07’ was particularly apt because 08 was obviously a year too far.

Women in national leadership roles are a very different animals from men. Maggie Thatcher dug the miners into a very deep hole and kicked the Argies out of the Falklands within a week or two. This represents a lifetime’s work for people like George W and Kevin.

Men seem able immune to the aura of power acquired by female national leaders. So women are able to concentrate more on running the country free from the distractions of groupies like Mick Jagger and Tiger Woods.

It’s a shame that being a president or prime minister is such a great gig that it attracts people who could contribute much more usefully to the community in other fields.

Obama would have made an outstanding TV talk show host; Ahmadinejad is a natural prison warden, Julia’s a headmistress to the manner born and it’s an absolute tragedy that Kevin didn’t work overseas.

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe

The Ultimate Asylum - Thursday, July 15th, 2010

There is dismay amongst the truly informed that Julia is adopting such a limited perspective on the asylum seeker issue.

Recognised authorities like Friday Mash believe that the ultimate solution is a World Asylum Seeker Processing Centre rather than a piddling regional operation in a place like East Timor.

And the obvious location for it is NZ.

For some time there has been disquiet in international circles that NZ could soon become a world also-ran, merely another group of South Sea islands unable to compete with Fiji in the packaged holiday market because of its appalling weather.

It may already be too late. The NZ Air Force has been reduced to a VIP limousine service, the Army is tipped to become a management service for shooting galleries and the Navy could soon become a cruise operator out of Auckland Harbour.

Asylum seekers are a world problem demanding a world class solution. In contrast to politicians whose thought bubble on the subject floats somewhere between East Timor and PNG, experts who know what they’re talking about believe the world is waiting for the NZ Solution.

A World Asylum Seeker Processing Centre could do for NZ what convicts did for Australia. Friday Mash can now exclusively reveal the essential elements of this inspirational plan.

The NZ Navy would cruise the world picking up asylum seekers on a regular schedule at ports like Basra, Vladivostok, Karachi, Mogadishu, Colombo and Southampton. This will save asylum seekers legging it for thousands of kilometres and put the people smugglers out of business.

No-one would ever need suffer repression under a brutal dictatorship. All they need do is call up the NZ Navy and do a runner.

Anyone looking the slightest bit likely to start a war or a revolution would be placed on the next ship out of town.

Oppressed minorities could be relocated in a country like Australia which only oppresses majorities.

The chronically disgruntled, jilted lovers, the unemployed, football fanatics whose team bombed out at the World Cup, people who are fed up with their local weather, beer or television could all find a new life through the NZ Solution.

Resettlement counsellors would be available at the processing centre to help asylum seekers determine their new country of choice.

They must avoid at all costs sending Palestinians to Israel, Uighurs to China and anyone to Iran, Guantanamo Bay or North Korea. Furthermore they must ensure that no-one is sent to Coventry or Siberia and that Frogs and Septics are sent nowhere but home.

It is confidently expected that following a period of counselling and introspection many asylum seekers would happily return home after being stuck in NZ for a few months.

Experts calculate that the plan could result in up to a quarter of the world’s population being in NZ at any given time. The benefits this would bring to the country are incalculable.

Suddenly a small nation off the arse-end of Australia would be toasted throughout the world for its services to humanity. The NZ Navy would be boosted to become among the world’s largest, the Air Force could run a service for VIP asylum seekers and the Army would have to be strengthened in case World War III broke out in the processing centre.

And as for all those Kiwis desperately seeking to go to another asylum the good news would be that the way out is just down the road.

This is an adapted extract from Roger Pugh’s book ‘The ReColonisation of Australia by Poms’ to be published shortly on-line.

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe

Romeo and Julia - Thursday, July 8th, 2010

Never was there a story of more woe
than this of Julia and her Romeo

It is a story of two star-crossed lovers destined never to find true togetherness. Their ardour is stranded on opposite sides of the political divide.

Julia is a child of the Australian Labor Party, a pantheon of power-brokers who hate neo-liberals.

Romeo is the scion of neo-liberalism in the Liberal Party whose policy has always been to abhor women who talk like an AFL commentator from the western suburbs of Melbourne.

Romeo and Julia seem drawn together in an animal sort of way probably because they’re both pollcats.

These political soulmates both think Kevin and Malcolm are a couple of global warming wankers, both agree with the asylum seeker old testament according to John Howard and are at one in the view that political correctness was invented in a vain attempt to persuade people to take the Greens seriously.

In parliament it seems Romeo’s always with the ayes and Julia’s always behind the nose. Romeo would never join a union even with Julia and she would never contemplate getting down to business in his company.

Julia’s appalling track record in choosing men is matched by her inspirational record in dumping them.

She fell deeply in love with Mark Latham until she discovered he was an underdone fruitcake and comprehensively baked him.

Then she totally submerged herself in support of water-walking Kevin but when he sprang a few leaks she got her head above water far enough to sink him and discover she was the only fish in the sea.

Romeo still fantasises that one day he and Julia will be politically compatible but commentators believe that even if she puts him to her bedroom cabinet she’ll keep him locked in.

With Julia on the left side and Romeo on the right its difficult to see how they can get a bit on either side.

And soon they will be seriously shafting each other in a federal election.

When she calls him ‘a liar in lycra’ and he calls her ‘ten pound pom who’s not worth two bob’ how could they possibly respect each other in the morning?

If Julia loses the election she’ll be at the mercy of the power-brokers who’ll probably replace her with Wayne or Stephen somebody or other.

If Romeo loses he will probably retire to Manly to contemplate what might have been.

It is the East and Julia is the sun.

The Senate and the House of Representatives remain implacably opposed to any rapprochement between the two in case they develop a coalition for each other.

A plague o’ both your houses.

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe

An Imperfect Democracy - Thursday, July 1st, 2010

When you think of the most imperfect democracies in the world Venezuela, Iran
and Zimbabwe come readily to mind and then of course there’s the Australian Labor Party.

NSW is arguably the democratic heartland of the ALP and nowhere is their style of power-broked democracy more apparent.

The democratically elected Iemma Government was replaced by the power-broked Rees Government which was in turn replaced by the power-broked Kristina
Government.

It’s true to say that power-broking has made for a better looking NSW Government but alas not better performed.

The NSW electorate was ropable. They’d always assumed that change of governments were essentially their responsibility. However ace power-brokers Joe Tripodi and Eddie Obeid took it upon themselves to recycle Nathan Rees from the dustbins of democracy and to clamber into the tank for septic Kristina.

Emboldened no doubt by this power-broking pandemic factional leaders Bill Shorten and Mark Arbib powered Julia into office and power-drilled Kevin into the wilderness.

And they did it ‘for the good of Australia’.

It was certainly good for Bill and Mark. They’ve proved they’ve got the power and if they don‘t get cabinet posts soon they’ll power-broke Wayne or somebody in to replace Julia. It was obviously terrific for Julia and arguably the Labor Party. But if they truly wanted to do something for the good of Australia and indeed the world they could power-broke Kevin into becoming Kim Jong-il’s successor in North Korea.

He’d actually be a breath of fresh air up there.

Paul Howes, the national secretary of the AWU has obvious pretensions to power-broking. The democratic rights of millions who voted Kevin 07 into office are apparently as nothing compared with the interests of Paul and his members.

He announced on television that he had power-broked against Kevin to save his union from Tony Abbott. He should be advised to use the democratic method of achieving that objective just like the rest of us. It’s called a general election.

Power-broking is exercised by people who can’t get the power they need through the democratic process or alternatively see it as a path to posterior protection.

Thank goodness general elections come along every so often to remind us that we live in a democracy rather than a power-brokery.

It is interesting that power-brokers have recently switched their support to women.

They may be disappointed to find these puppets come with no strings attached.

Kevin may have been an insufferable prig but he was our insufferable prig.

If we had to suffer because we democratically elected him we should at least have been accorded the luxury of atoning for our mistake. Unlike Labor power-brokers we have to wait three years for the opportunity.

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe

Brilliant Insights from Friday Mash - Thursday, July 1st, 2010

Brilliant Insights from Friday Mash

On Friday 16th July 2010:

Insiders believe that Julia’s Asylum Seekers Plan B is a regional processing centre in Afghanistan. This ingenious strategy cuts out people smugglers, avoids awful places like Nauru and PNG and makes it much cheaper to send asylum seeking members of the Taliban back to where they came from.

On Friday 8th July 2010:

Population experts believe that by 2050 the population of the East Timor asylum seeker processing centre will be bigger than the population of East Timor and Julia Gillard will be a national hero for creating the Building the Asylum Seeker Revolution

On Friday 2nd July 2010:

For years Labor politicians assured us that Kevin was PM perfection. Now it turns out they hated him with a fine passion. It seems the only politicians who have been telling as the truth about Kevin all along are Malcolm Turnbull and Tony Abbott.

On Friday 25th June 2010:

There seems to have been a misunderstanding in the Socceroos’ planning for the World Cup. They’d always planned a big send-off but not during matches.

Share This PostPost on FacebookEmail this articleTweet ThisRSS Subscribe